#envhist: Social media and community-building in environmental history

By Wilko Hardenberg

Social media represent a great opportunity to create communities that go beyond traditional circles of acquaintances. This is more so important in a field such as environmental history which openly aims at transdisciplinarity and transnationality. In fact, social media give the opportunity to be heard by and interact with an audience that goes way beyond, both geographically and conceptually, the limits of academia and includes not only amateur historians and practitioners of other disciplines (e.g. in the natural sciences), but aims also at involving the general public.

But how far is environmental history actually present on social networks?[1]

A simple search of “environmental history” on Facebook[2] gives an undetermined amount of results: its “interest page” has 213 “likes”, while the ASEH is followed by 376 people and the European society ESEH by 166. GooglePlus similarly gives an unknown quantity of results. As regards professional networks, on Linkedin[2] the same search gives 1,100 results, while on academia.edu there are 631 people following environmental history as a research interest (and 371 papers, 10 questions and 3 journals). In all these cases however, in particular as a newcomer, it is difficult to filter out noise and not-relevant information. Even if in GooglePlus it is easy to save searches for future reference, the main way to find relevant content in most social media is to add people to your friends/circles/acquaintances/followees. In other words there is no straightforward way to follow environmental history as a theme. The creation of dedicated groups on LinkedIn and Facebook could be a way to overcome, at least in part, this problem.

On Twitter the situation is slightly different, thanks to the widespread use of hashtags, which let you join “conversations” about specific topics. Conference hashtags, like #aseh2012, help to livestream and follow topical issues, allowing also people who are not able to attend to have a feel of what is going on. Moreover, conference hashtags may be used to do a sort of joint note-taking effort. In fact, taking notes directly on Twitter gives you the opportunity to discuss them immediately with other people interested in that topic, as well as to have a feed of notes about parallel sessions you are not able to be at.

The hashtag #envhist is instead helping to build a community that virtually meets beyond conferences, a trans-national community able to bring on the debate (even if with the intrinsic length limits of the medium). But maybe the length limits are an asset: just recently at a conference about academic blogging @melissaterras (UCL-DH) has briefly summarized a history of blogging, stressing how by now Twitter, together with other microblogging tools, in part thanks just to its 140 characters limit, has taken over the original role of blogs: helping people to find interesting content through linking. Sites like The Broadside aggregate links to information relevant to historians by tracking certain hashtags: obviously #envhist is the tag of choice for anything related to environmental history.

The possibility to post links to further content (75% of #envhist tweets contain a link), accompanied just by a description and maybe a short comment, is crucial in the creation of what is by now the fastest and most proactive source of information about environmental history relevant events. Even with a relatively small community of active users references to call for papers, research opportunities, interesting articles, conference live-streams and any other possible useful piece of information in environmental history spread almost instantly. And the potential community that may be affected by a #envhist post is much wider than its active users’ group, reaching to all the followers of people who retweet a message.

The main problem of Twitter being its short memory (in this sense it definitely isn’t an historian’s friend) to find anything older than a week is a pretty tough endeavor that requires to delve into various online tools that promise, with various degrees of trustworthiness, to perform full searches of past tweets. The only possibility to overcome this flaw of the medium is to become also an archivist, and save interesting hashtags on our own (and this is crucial if you plan to use Twitter for the abovementioned crowdsourced note-taking effort). Therefore, in occasion of last year’s conference of the ESEH, I’ve started to archive #envhist (thanks to @mhawksey’s Twitter Analytics Google Spreadsheet). As to avoid to miss any #ASEH2012 tweet, as has happened unfortunately with the early #envhist tweets, the archiving of this hashtag has been ongoing already for a couple of weeks.

The first recorded #envhist tweet dates back to about two years ago, but it seems that the hashtag made only sparse appearances during its first year of existence. The moment in which it has started to be used somehow consistently dates to a year ago: 99,9% of the 2300 archived tweets (of which more than 700 are retweets) have been posted after April 2011.

In any case, on the basis of the available data more than 200 people have used #envhist at least once (and this obviously includes many people who have used it inadvertently by retweeting) and ca. 100 have used it at least twice. At the moment only a group of about 35 people/organizations is however using it somehow regularly (>10 tweets). An idea of how the users’ group clusters is given by this visualization. The arrows indicate either a mention, a retweet or a response, while the wide nebula of unlinked dots represents the occasional users.

The geographic distribution of the users’ group seems to be concentrated in Europe and North America, with a quite important presence of the Canadian community, thanks to the efforts of our friends at NiCHE. It must be kept in mind that these specific data are limited to the latest tweets and to those users who have activated Twitter’s geolocation feature. They may however be somehow indicative of a trend, as are the available data about linguistic distribution which show a total predominance of English.

What the #envhist community should try to do now, with the aim to divulge an even greater amount of information to an ever increasing audience, is definitely to enlarge its core users group and widen its geographic distribution to non-English speaking areas.

  1. All data in this post have been checked and updated on Saturday 24 March 2012  ↩
  2. You need to be logged in into the respective service to access these links. Here are the screenshots of the search results:


This article has 2 comments

  1. Sean Kheraj Reply


    This is some fantastic analysis. I remember @SmithMillCreek ‘s first #envhist Tweet. I also remember when Jim Clifford and others responded to the first discussion about settling on a single hashtag. During that time we were working on the Environmental History Mobile application and wanted to push more content to this hashtag so that we could integrate it into the app and have a section of the app that not only updated multiple times a day, but one that was based on community input. #envhist has indeed become a very vibrant community. I think this past year might work well as a case study for other scholarly disciplines looking for models for building online communities.

    I also agree that we need to continue to think of ways to expand the community. Better integrating other languages may be the way to go. We have tried to incorporate non-English sources into the EH Top News section of the mobile application (http://envhist.com). I wonder if there is a translator application that could be used to re-tweet from one language to another to facilitate crossing of language barriers? Does anyone know of such an application?

    Congratulations on launching this fantastic looking website. I’m looking forward to following this one.

  2. Mark Reply

    Looks very interesting. Lots of analysis. Very impressive well done. I would second Sean’s comments re. different languages – it’s good (but also bad) that most #envhist tweets are in English.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *